Hi,
As David is saying "Sometimes OASIS work has to go where the "big
guys" fear to tread".
The Norwegian
Authoreties has now introdused the Norwegian Health Care and
Interoperability reform plan released 19. June
2009:
This is
adressing the enormous challenges in interoperability and promote the structure
of a needed Hybrid thinking as we are working with in BCM and
EPR.
The elderly
wave Sunami is soon a big problem and we have now introduced an
interactive discussion forum through EPRforum with attached bloggs that will be
announced this week. On the Topic site "Technology
and Stanndards" we are adressing two important interoperability
areas:
1. The Super structure eFolder Engine ( ITIL
and OASIS BCM/CAM standards )
2. The Environmental control bus-process
server ( ANSI and CEA-721 standard)
See:
Unfortunately
we are still working without funding, but both NAV
SIKTE and BI is
supporting us.
As you also
know we are working with several related projects for getting funding, but
in the meanwhile we are trying to explain the needed Governmental eFolder
controlled superstructure.
Carl, what do we need to convice OASIS about
proceeding?
Could we try to connect some projects with the
Obama's Health reform ?
Should we translate som of the NAV and BI comitments ?
PS:
Unfortinately the links mostly refer to Norwegian texts, but at least some
figures and content should be familiar
BR
Hans
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 6:29
PM
Subject: Fwd: [bcm] Close BCM TC? (BCM is
needed NOW more than ever!)
Gentleman:
Are you able to contribute more of your EPR insights to create a formal
BCM specification
thanks
Carl
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info>Date: Tue, Aug
11, 2009 at 11:41 AM Subject: RE: [bcm] Close BCM TC? (BCM is needed NOW
more than ever!) To: carl mattocks < carlmattocks@gmail.com> Cc:
McRae < mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>, bcm@lists.oasis-open.org
Carl,
Sometimes OASIS work has to go where the "big guys" fear to tread.
The EPR work offers templates for work processes and task cards with an
open public standard.
How relevant is this?
Check - iPhone, Android, Sharepoint / InfoPath, Ruby forms, ERP from SAP
and Oracle, Facebook - all wonderful people enablers - except - none of them
can talk to each other.
Since OASIS now appears to want to see specification production happening
every 6 months within a TC - I think we start moving out on this.
Yes - its a big task needing real funding to complete the core XML tasks
- but there is much we can do besides - while we sort out that funding.
Suggest we do the "top part" of the specification - Executive Summary,
Introduction and initial ToC. That will keep us "legal" with OASIS - and
then six months from now - we can see what resources we have to do the next
piece. You never know - maybe Google Foundation of similar will fund us
then and provide some fulltime resources?!?
Rome was not built in a day.
Thanks, DW
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [bcm] Close BCM
TC? From: carl mattocks < carlmattocks@gmail.com> Date: Fri, August 07, 2009
4:55 pm To: bcm@lists.oasis-open.orgCc: McRae < mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> Folks:
We have to decide if the EPR work and the lessons learned from the 70+
effort can be used to create additional BCM guidelines.
Please reply by email by August 17th if you are able to contribute to a
new work effort
thanks
Carl Mattocks
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote:
Section
2.15 of the TC Process: The TC Administrator may close a TC that fails
to conduct at least one Quorate Meeting or conduct any Specification
Ballots during any six month period; whose membership falls below the
Minimum Membership; which has not completed its deliverables within the
schedule listed in its Charter; or which has failed to show progress
towards achieving its purpose as defined by its Charter.
The most
recent meeting minutes seem to be from 2008; there are no calendar entries
for 2009, and the only deliverable noted in the Charter is the original
BCM specification which was approved in 2006.
Is there further work
to be done by the TC on the BCM specification or additional specifications
to be created? Or should we declare victory and
close?
Regards,
Mary
Mary P McRae Director,
Standards Development Technical Committee Administrator OASIS:
Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: fiberartisan
#oasisopen phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like
parachutes: they work best when they're
open.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in
OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
-- Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC co-Chair
(ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC Ontolog ONION Cop
Leader President Berkeley Town Underwater Search & Rescue
Unit vmail (usa) (732) 497-CARL
[2275] CarlMattocks@CheckMi.com Open Source : Lissom
Semantics -- Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC co-Chair
(ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC Ontolog ONION Cop
Leader President Berkeley Town Underwater Search & Rescue Unit vmail
(usa) (732) 497-CARL [2275] CarlMattocks@CheckMi.com Open Source :
Lissom Semantics
|