Re: WS-CAF

[Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM>]

I proposed this meeting and the closure of the TC on purely procedural 
grounds.  The TC has completed its work, become inactive and has no 
future items to consider.  It is worth noting that this TC has not 
addressed issues (all minor technical or perhaps editorial) open since 
last October.

None of this has any link to WS-CAF; nor is my proposal a comment on the 
value of the work (BTP) we have completed.  Closing a TC does not 
devalue or destroy anything.  In fact, the change would reduce questions 
about this supposedly still-open effort that may be thought of as 
questions about the protocol.

I would much rather have a wrap party (declare victory) than a funeral 
(watch as the OASIS TC Administrator closes the group for us).

thanx,
	doug

On 17-Sep-03 06:52, William Z Pope wrote:

> I can't help but notice that the people pushing for the meeting on
> closing the TC are all members of the WS-CAF authors group.  Can
> any of you tell me if this is part of an effort to move WS-CAF
> forward?  Would bringing WS-CAF to OASIS be predicated on closing
> the BTP TC?
> 
> =bill
> 
> William Z Pope                            Bill.Pope@Choreology.com
> Choreology Ltd                          US Office: +1 603 373 0598
> Director of Product Management   London Office: +44 (0)8707 369686
>                                            Mobile: +1 603 502 4490

-- 
SunNetwork 2003 Conference and Pavilion
"An unparalleled event in network computing! Make the net work for you!"

WHEN:  September 16-18, 2003
WHERE: Moscone Center, San Francisco

For more information or to register for the conference, please visit:
http://www.sun.com/sunnetwork