[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cam] Groups - CAM-v1-draft-013.ZIP uploaded
Gnosis_@compuserve.com wrote: Dave, A few questions regarding the document update, by section or concept: * Section 2.5: Explain what you mean about a test harness. * Section 4.1.1: What is a CAM member (is this a registry object owner, for example - who manages this)? * Section 4.2.1: You have been expanding the CAM efforts/scope and now are not only talking about content assembly but business process validation. Can we do a check-balance against the charter - I see assembly instructions, but not validation. * Section 4.6.1: Will this <choice> construct support some of the work coming out of other TC that actually define how references to code lists can be maintained (such as UBL)? * As I have asked in a previous email., isn't this just a assembly mechanism, not the validation of the processes it supports (The document should specify the structural processing instructions, not the business logic associated with the process validation, correct)? My question is rooted in how this may affect semantic interoperability. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]