[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: re: [cam] CAM Masks
Martin, The idea is you can use them several ways - as validation against content, as a design layout reference, and also to output in the format perscribed given a base type input value. Obviously this depends on what mode you are referencing the CAM template in. This may have to be an external context parameter passed into the CAM processor - %as:updateContent% / true / false - depending on the business needs. An interesting idea - that we can have built-in context parameters for behaviours of the CAM processor itself. This may be nice too for overriding the CAM Level - so you may have a Level 1 template, but tell the CAM processor to parse it at Level 2, etc, for compatiblity reasons. Is there another approach, or is this something else we can look to add to revision 0.14 as a clarification? Thanks, DW. ================================================================= Message text written by INTERNET:martin.me.roberts@bt.com >Another question is when are Masks applied. Are they simply for validation or are they to be used to change the input file and output the result according to the mask. This also raises the question as to whether processing should add defaulted elements into the result tree after validation. <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]