Fwd: RE: D/SDR fix...

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Does anyone see anything wrong with this additional correction to the 
9.5.4.6 lists?  Looks okay to me...

>[...]
>2) In paragraph 11, I think that the Glyph Mapping element needs to be added
>to the list titled "SF data within SDR parameters."  The glyph-code
>association parameter is of type SDR.  The SDR as defined in the standard
>contains two members, a list of type UI8, and a list of type UI32.  However,
>the glyph source identifier "will determine the nature of the association
>which is established by the glyph-code association parameter" and can be
>extended by registration.  Presumably, a future registered glyph source
>could specify that the glyph-code association SDR contains one or more
>members of type SF.  Admittedly, that is unlikely, but you never know.