Re: [dita] use of <term>

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 3/12/09 9:32 AM, "Alan Houser" <arh@groupwellesley.com> wrote:

> I recall that there was a semantic linking feature on the table for DITA
> 1.1, which may have been associated with the <term> element. I believe
> it died more to lack of inertia than anything else.
> 
> I would concur with Paul Grosso's assessment that this would be
> application behavior, best left to implementers.

The language should definitely be removed.

Term takes keyref=, which means that in DITA 1.2 term can be an explicit
link (via keyref) to glossary entries (or any other target).

Cheers,

E.
----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>