[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] problem with packaging of glossaries
On 8/20/09 6:05 PM, "Ann Rockley" <rockley@rockley.com> wrote: > I also agree with Bruce that they should remain as part of the base > architectural specification. And I agree with JoAnn that bookmap is relevant > to multiple industries, eg pharma could use it for submissions, we just > finished working with a book publisher and we used it there, it would make > sense for medical devices etc. I would caution anyone on the use of bookmap. It's design is severely broken in a number of ways that preclude it's use for many important use cases. I would advise very strongly against considering it for anything as generic as phrama submissions. Cheers, Eliot ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]