[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms? Referencingand referenced element?
Private copy of terminology topic -- sorry, Elliot, but reading that makes me cringe. I've now spent 5 or 6 hours working on the terminology topic, working review comments and editing. Please send me your private copy of the terminology topic and I will merge the two. Kris Eliot Kimber wrote: > On 12/2/09 8:39 AM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> > wrote: > > >> Thanks, Gershon. I've now edited most of the terms and handled all but five or >> six of the review topics. (Paul and Jeff, I'll be sending you e-mail ...) >> >> However, I noticed that the topic does not contain any of the linking and >> addressing terminology; I thought we had agreed to move it there. >> > > That move is part of the linking rework I've been doing--you can see the > move reflected in my private copy of the terminology topic--I was planning > to merge that with the main terminology topic once I got to it, which will > be this evening. > > Cheers, > > E. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]