[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: acknowledgements [was: Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Don Day [mailto:dond@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 2010 February 16 12:14 > To: DITA TC list > Subject: [dita] Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010 > > Agenda for 16 February 2010 DITA TC Meeting/Call > 6. Acknowledgments in DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? > o > http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201002/msg00033.html > (Eberlein, 9 February 2010) > >Kristen summarized. Concerns are how to avoid leaving out anyone who > has > done a lot of work. Consensus: Criterion is that list must include > those > who have actively contributed as Members during 1.2 > development(proposals, > authors, commenters, implementors of the DTDs and XSDs). > >Action for Gershon to prepare this list. There is a difference between editors of a spec and membership in the TC that develops a spec. I suggest that what Gershon should prepare is a list of "editors" (and he can interpret that as he wishes, but I would tend to stick to authors of text and schemas, not commentors and reviewers). Then we have some section (I would not call it Acknowledg(e)ments) that says something like: The DITA 1.2 specification is a product of the OASIS DITA Technical Committee. The committee members at the time of publication were: [and then list all current members of the TC] paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]