[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] TC Minutes 10 August 2010
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 2010 August 10 11:28 > To: DITA TC > Subject: [dita] TC Minutes 10 August 2010 > > DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 10 August 2010 > > Chaired by Don Day <donday@bga.com> > Minutes recorded by Bruce Nevin <bnevin@cisco.com> > > The DITA Technical Committee met on Tuesday, 10 August 2010 at 08:00am > PT for 55 minutes. > > 8:00-8:05 Roll call > Roll call > * Regrets: Gershon Joseph > > Quorum was achieved. > > STANDING BUSINESS: > ================== > Approve minutes from previous business meeting: > > o http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201007/msg00083.html > (Joseph) > > Moved by Don, seconded by Kris, approved by acclamation. > > Subcommittee/liaison reports: > ============================= > For some weeks, SC reports will not follow list order, as we return to > those that have been skipped. > > o OASIS DITA Adoption TC > Page created for testimonials by DITA 1.2 users. > Discussion on potential article identifying those elements that > ought > to be or typically are styled. > Mary has announced the new Asian Adoption SC. > Looking for additional members, especially those interested in > authoring articles. > Getting a lot of hits on the articles in dita.xml.org. > > Action Items: > ============= > o No discussion > > Comments: > ========= > Don has sent and will send reminders to those processing comments. > > o PublicReview1Comments > * Assign open owners > ACTION: Don to contact Chris Kravogel about Public Review item C008 and > recommend action to Kris Eberlein. > > o Testimonials from organizations using DITA 1.2 > > We noted Gershon's addition of the list of vendor representation on > TC. > > JoAnn: We discussed last week the need for the TC to know what > vendors are doing, and a number of major vendors are not represented. > She will make sure the 1.2 status paper gets out to them. > > We welcomed the news that Kris has accepted DITA evangelist position > with SDL, with condition that they donate 4-6 hours to the TC. > > JoAnn: In a separate category on this page we should list vendors ^^^^^^^^^^ What page (URL please)? paul > who > have some support of DITA, and use this list to track contacts so as to > prevent duplication of effort and contact. > > BUSINESS: > ========= > 1. Heads Up: change in rev attribute usage, ongoing > Kris removed old values from spec file in July. If anyone makes content > changes, mark it with rev mark public-review-1. > CLOSE > > 2. ITEM: DITA 1.1 errata (skip until Eric Sirois is attending; hold for > next week) > > 3. ITEM: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/DITA_1.3_Proposal_Process. > Email discussed means to make sure relevant subcommittees are engaged > when a new proposal affects them (or they it). > CLOSE: ready for TC reference when needed for DITA 1.3 > * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201007/msg00091.html > (Anderson) > > 4. ITEM: Announce DITA 1.2 Feature article and comments > CLOSE: Already voted by the Adoption TC. When OKed by Gershon, will > publish. > > 5. New ITEM: Content outcomes of "cascading of xml:lang attribute" > discussion > * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201008/msg00041.html > (last comment, Grosso) > > We are clear that @xml:lang on a map should not cascade. An additional > reason for users to set it on each topic is that processors have a > variety of ways to set a default, and this could cause problems. Should > be able to point to a definitive FAQ. > CLOSE > > ACTION: Don: log this issue on the 1.2 comments wiki so we can track it > there. > ACTION: JoAnn: take this to the translation SC > ACTION: Su-Laine: Try to improve wording in the spec, bring it back to > the TC. > > 6. New ITEM: Clarification needed on whether xml:lang is required > * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201008/msg00038.html > (Yeo) > > Eliot: The XML standard http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag says > xml:lang applies to an element and all its children, so nested topics > don't have to specify it, and therefore DITA cannot require it at the > DTD level. > Kris will work on clarifying the wording at 2.1.3.9.1, with Su-Laine, > JoAnn, and Eliot engaged as interested parties. > CLOSE > > 8:55 Announcements/Opens > 8:55 Adjourn >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]