[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 11 January 2011
Yes, it shows the temporal sequence accurately, but that's confusing. I'll move it with an explanatory note in brackets. And thanks for the name fix. Amended minutes forthcoming. > -----Original Message----- > From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:47 PM > To: dita > Subject: RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: > 11 January 2011 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 2011 January 11 11:15 > > To: dita > > Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 11 January > > 2011 > > > > Re: > > > 2. New ITEM: microXML and the future of DITA > > > > o > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00004.html (Day) > > > > Is this an issue that we need to track here? Discussion > indicates that > > although this is not an 'official' issue, there is > potential concern. > > Web 2.0 Workgroup interested in watching it. If applications > supporting > > uXML are primarily oriented to HTML-5, will they preclude > DITA? The TC > > will leave this issue for the DITA for the web SC to monitor. > > > > 3. New ITEM: Ruminations on the structure of the DITA Standard > > > > o http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00009.html > (Nitchie) > > > > Consideration for DITA 2.0. Might make the uXML issue more > manageable. > > Michael: uXML is proposal for . . . > > > > > ACTION (Eliot): review to confirm that James is not doing anything > > that is unworkable. > > > > ACTION (Dita for the Web SC): monitor this. > > Most of the discussion (that I elided) under item 3 appears > really to be a discussion of item 2. In particular, the two > actions are, I believe, in response to item 2. > > I assume TC members who are interested in this > topic--especially those who want to monitor related > discussion--have seen my email at > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00007.html > where I gave pointers to the W3C task force on this topic > (which includes James Clark and others). > > > > > > 4. New ITEM: wiki.oasis-open.org pages in search results > > > > o > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00010.html (Yeo) > > > > o Discuss any further recommendations; Chairs to forward requests to > Robin Cover > > > > Michael: We don't want to put up barriers to search, openness is a > > critical value. We might reduce its ranking. Alternative: put a link > at > > the top of such pages pointing to the latest info. Don: this would > > raise the google search rank. Su-Laine: But you're right, clearer > > labeling is needed on these pages. > > > > Rather than push old items down, we can pull official pages up in > > prominence, e.g. by adding links. Don: this is a problem for other > > standards in OASIS. > > > > ACTION (Don, Kris): Forward discussion to Robert Carr for OASIS > > recommendation. > > There may very well be a Robert Carr working for OASIS, but I > wonder if what was mean here is Robin Cover. > > paul > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS > TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your > TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr > oups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]