[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Questions about last week's minutes
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:keberlein@sdl.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 2011 March 15 9:08 > To: Grosso, Paul; dita@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Questions about last week's minutes > > Hi, Paul. > > I know that Stan answered some of your questions in e-mails and his > explanations of the modified minutes. Let me see if I can answer some > of your > unanswered questions. > > Report from Learning and Training SC: > ------------------------------------- > > > - Processing support: Su-Laine asked John for an update on the > > state of processing support for the L&T specializations. John > > reported that the current L&T specializations relied heavily > > on default processing tools and flows. That said, the L&T > > SC has posted a set of sample topics and set of XHTML > > processing extensions for review. > > > <Paul> XHTML processing extensions or expectations? Has posted where? > Need a > URI if you want it reviewed. Reviewed for what? Is it to become a TC > deliverable? </Paul> Stan said he heard "extensions". > > <Kris> I think the phrase "for review" should simply removed. </Kris> I'm still intrigued (and perhaps a bit concerned) about "XHTML processing extensions", so I'd like to learn more about them, so I'd still like a URL. If an "SC has posted" something, then there should be a URL so that interested TC members can read what the SC has posted. paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]