[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Status of 13089: Is Better Than I Represented It
I am having a bad day: the reference topics *are* in the proposal doc, as well as available as separate files. So I think the minimum V3 requirements are met. My apologies to Mark and Doug for misrepresenting the state of their proposal. Cheers, E. On 6/4/13 1:47 PM, "Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@rsicms.com> wrote: > It turns out I was inadvertently working from an old version of the 13089 V3 > spec. The correct version is much more complete and closer to the V3 > requirements. However, the language reference topics are currently provided > as separate topics, not part of the proposal XML doc. But they are written. > > Cheers, > > E. > > -- > Eliot Kimber > Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions > "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" > Main: 512.554.9368 > www.rsicms.com > www.rsuitecms.com > Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, > http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]