[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OASIS processes for errata
Here is the relevant content from the Technical Committee (TC)
process at
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#errata .
My interpretation is below: ------------------------ 3.5 Approved Errata A TC may approve a set of Errata to an OASIS Standard which it developed as "Approved Errata" by: (a) Adopting the set of proposed corrections as a Committee Specification Draft, in the form of a list of changes, and optionally accompanied by a copy of the original OASIS Standard text marked to incorporate the proposed changes. (b) Confirming by Full Majority Vote that the proposed corrections do not constitute a Substantive Change. (c) Submitting the proposed corrections for a 15-day public review, and completing that review, pursuant to Section 3.2. (d) After the public review, confirming the proposed corrections as Approved Errata by a Full Majority Vote. Once approved, the Approved Errata shall be made available with the OASIS Standard it corrects, in any publication of that OASIS Standard. Disposition of Approved Errata must be identified in the subsequent Committee Specification Public Review Draft of the corrected OASIS Standard. A TC may not adopt Approved Errata to an OASIS Standard more than once in any six-month period. ------------------------ My interpretation -- Chet, please correct me if I am wrong:
--
Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]