[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] RE: Issue #29: Bookmap modifications -- Attn reviewers Amber Swope and Robert Anderson
A quick question. So adding mapref and subjectScheme to mapresources, does it make sense to add the classifyDomain (topicsubject?)
to the mix as well? Éric Sirois DITA Toolsmith IXIASOFT 825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1 tel + 1 514 279-4942 / toll free + 1 877 279-4942 mobile + 1 647 462-3620 eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com
/
www.ixiasoft.com
From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Éric Sirois
I have no issue with the name change. Éric Sirois DITA Toolsmith IXIASOFT 825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1 tel + 1 514 279-4942 / toll free + 1 877 279-4942 mobile + 1 647 462-3620 eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com
/
www.ixiasoft.com
From: Scott Hudson [mailto:scott.hudson@jeppesen.com]
What about generalizing the element name: resources ? Thanks and best regards, --Scott From:
<dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Éric Sirois <eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com> Hi Amber, The bookmapresources is simply an anchor point to allow other specializations to hook into that spot. The way the
shell is setup you will never see bookmapresources in a drop down menu in an XML editor. It’s there for specializers. The markup below is correct. Bookmapresources is based on topicref
<!-- LONG NAME: Bookmap Specialization Placeholder --> Bookmap.dtd shell: Usually you whould see “bookmapresources |
%bookmapkeydefs-d-bookmapresources;”, but we omitted the first part so it’s not available.
<!ENTITY % bookmapresources
"%bookmapkeydefs-d-bookmapresources; Éric Sirois DITA Toolsmith IXIASOFT 825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1 tel + 1 514 279-4942 / toll free + 1 877 279-4942 mobile + 1 647 462-3620 eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com
/
www.ixiasoft.com
From:
dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Amber Swope My apologies for the late response. I have reviewed the proposal and have the following comments/questions:
1.
Does the proposed <bookmapresources> element only allow specializations of <topicref> or also include <topicref> elements?
2.
Is the sample markup correct? Or should <bookmapkeydefs> be replaced with <bookmapresources>? <booktitle> <mainbooktitle>Test</mainbooktitle> </booktitle>
<bookmapkeydefs> <keydef keys="test" href="">
</bookmapkeydefs> <ditavalref href=""> </bookmap>
3.
Also, can we include sample usage of the proposed <bookmakers> element? Thanks, Amber PS – I will be unable to attend tomorrow’s meeting.
From: Kristen
James Eberlein [mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com]
Have you reviewed the stage two proposal for #29? Is it ready for TC discussion tomorrow?
Best, On 2/26/2018 12:30 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]