I'm not seeing a lot of location differences between the proposed options. I'd still prefer to have <example> available in these locations, and prefer the actual element to adding a note @type.
Agreed on adding an element rather than a note type.
For the Stage 1 proposal, I'm not suggesting that we change <example> to be specialized from <fig> or <div>, but add it to the same locations, keeping the existing locations where it is allowed today.
Graydon Saunders | Publishing Solutions Developer | Precision
Content
Direct: +1 (647)265-8500
x106| Email: graydon@precisioncontent.com | www.precisioncontent.com
Unlock the Knowledge in Your Enterprise™
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Please
notify us by return email if you have received this email in error. ©2019, Precision Content Authoring Solutions Inc, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Sent: 16 July 2019 12:41
To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [dita] Allowed locations for <example>
Here is a list of the elements that example could be contained by (by scenario):
<example> akin to <fig>:
<abstract>, <body>, <bodydiv>, <dd>, <div>, <draft-comment>, <entry>, <example>, <fn>, <itemgroup>, <li>, <lq>, <note>, <p>, <section>, <sectiondiv>, <stentry>
add @type="example" to <note>:
<abstract>, <body>, <bodydiv>, <dd>, <desc>, <div>, <draft-comment>, <entry>, <example>, <fig>, <figgroup>, <fn>, <itemgroup>, <li>, <linkinfo>, <lq>, <p>, <section>, <sectiondiv>, <stentry>
<example> akin to <div>:
<abstract>, <body>, <bodydiv>, <dd>, <desc>, <div>, <draft-comment>, <entry>, <example>, <fig>, <figgroup>, <fn>, <itemgroup>, <li>, <linkinfo>, <lq>, <note>, <p>, <section>, <sectiondiv>, <stentry>
<example> today:
<body>, <conbody>, <conbodydiv>, <refbody>, <refbodydiv>, <taskbody>
I'm not seeing a lot of location differences between the proposed options. I'd still prefer to have <example> available in these locations, and prefer the actual element to adding a note @type.
For the Stage 1 proposal, I'm not suggesting that we change <example> to be specialized from <fig> or <div>, but add it to the same locations, keeping the existing locations where it is allowed today.
The content model of example would remain the same as well.
Thanks and best regards,
--Scott
Scott Hudson
Content Technology Strategist, DS&A Information and Knowledge Services
Jeppesen, A Boeing Company
55 Inverness Drive East
Englewood, CO 80112
303-328-6228 | Cell: 303-350-7934
