[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Updated stage two proposal for #647: Remove classification and add @subjectrefs
Hi Kris, I wonder if the current amended sentence is not too ambiguous: Add a new attribute,
@subjectrefs, to the
<topicref>
element and specializations of
<topicref>, as well as
<map>. It’s not clear to me whether we’re adding the subjecrefs attribute to <map> only, or also specializations of <map>. Would something like the following be clearer? Add a new attribute,
@subjectrefs, to the
<topicref> and <map>
elements
and specializations of
<topicref> and
<map>. Other than this comment, I’m good with the update to the proposal. Cheers, Gershon Gershon L Joseph |
Senior Information Architect | Precision Content | Phone: +972 (54) 658-3887|
TZ: Jerusalem, Israel (GMT+2) | Email: gershon@precisioncontent.com|
Twitter: @PCASinc |
www.precisioncontent.com Unlock the Knowledge in Your Enterprise™ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Please
notify us by return email if you have received this email in error.
© 2022, Precision Content Authoring Solutions Inc. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of kris eberleinconsulting.com Changes rendered in red. I’ll upload the updated DITA source after I send this e-mail. Best, Kris |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]