[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
(Just noticed in the guidelines that replies go to the author by default...oops) I haven't been following docbook too closely, recently, as other things have taken over my time (...:?) but is there a standard suite of test docbook files? (Similar to the jakarta batik project. they have a suite of test SVG files. The web site displays which tests succeed) regards, Matthew Harrison. > Rune Enggaard Jensen writes: > > Norm wrote: > > > > > Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the > > > element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to > > > happen.) > > > > > > I'll take a look. > > > > Now you are at it, could you please look at <productnumber>? They are also > > red in the PDF files I have tried to produce. > > > > Best regards > > > > Rune Enggaard > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: docbook-apps-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC