[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Q) Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Converting from DocBook/SGML to DocBook/XML
Ian Castle writes: > Currently, passivetex is probably happier sat on top of the TeXlive > distro. Which I don't have - and isn't RPM based which is important to I am working on that :-} > Passivetex is perhaps more "arcane" than jadetex - either way, it I dont agree. it does not have the bizarre intermediate representation to fight with > likely that fop will develop quicker as it has a fairly active > development community... does anyone other than Sebastian work on > passivetex? not really. yes, FOP moves faster > Currently, I consider the DSSSL toolchain to be in "stable, maintenance" > mode, while active development and future leaps in functionality will > come with the continuing development of the XSL toolchain. I'd concur with that sebastian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC