[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using inline.monoseq in FO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: | Why is it a great problem? The result should be 90% of the paragraph | size in the first case and 90% of the title size in the second. And on further inspection, it just looks awful. Setting the font size on the basis of "em"s is just wrong. It really should be based on relative "ex" heights and those aren't available. I think I'll abandon the crude attempt to make monospaced fonts look a little more aesthetically sized. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No man is more than another if he http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | does no more than Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | another.--Cervantes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+N9ZxOyltUcwYWjsRAuzQAJ4+WptpukG1mT55yzZG2+K1H8uCbQCfUvmK ESqchAqD3z07FGlgxe/XaTY= =HRYu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC