[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] dbfo keep-together for informal objects?
I don't think there is a reason. It would seem that the keep-together PI should also be made to work in informal objects such as informalexample. You can file a bug report on the DocBook SourceForge site about this. http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=27830&group_id=21935 Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <lists@egidy.de> To: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:08 AM Subject: [docbook-apps] dbfo keep-together for informal objects? > Hi, > > I want to make sure that some special <para>s are kept together on one page > for print output. > > I've seen that the dbfo keep-together PI is used for that. It works well if > you put a formal object like <example> around the paras. But because I just > want to group those paras and not add a title and an example number in front > of it I can not use it. > > It seems like keep-together is just supported for formal objects, not for > informal ones. Is there any reason behind this? > > How can I keep my paras together without using hacks like hard page breaks? > > Kind regards, > > Gerd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]