[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: dbfo-need height and FOP
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:25:57 +0200, Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> wrote: > First, I would recommend that you not use 1.75.1, but switch to 1.75.2. Sorry, my bad - I was actually using 1.75.2 but due to having all kinds of versions laying around I thought I was using 1.75.1. Sorry for the misinformation. > When I test dbfo-need with fop.0.95 and 1.75.2, I found that it does > work in some locations but not others. In the case of placing a > dbfo-need between block elements like para, it works. But if you put > the dbfo-need before a section element, it does not. > > Regarding the extra space that you noticed, that is the other problem > that fop 0.95 has. It does not yet handle the combination of properties > (primarily space-after.precedence) that puts the text back where it > should start when a dbfo-need is used. That is a limitation that must > await full support for the space-after property in FOP. Do you know of any specific issues in the fop bug tracker regarding these issues? I'd like to add myself as a CC so I can track the progress. > So the question is, should we enable a feature for fop 0.95 that > sometimes works but sometimes not, and that adds space where it > shouldn't. I would vote to add support only when FOP handles the > feature properly. But others may see it differently. I agree with you. I just wanted to know where the failures are. ::Antti::
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]