[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Including <b> and <i> in XHTML stylesheets
I wonder if anyone is using b and i in selectors in CSS? Such selectors would have to be enhanced to include the new element names. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Fahlgren" <abdelazer@gmail.com> To: "DocBook Apps ML" <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:02 PM Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: Including <b> and <i> in XHTML stylesheets > Leaving aside the issue of the highlighting stylesheets, here are the > uses of <i> in the html/ stylesheets: > > biblio-iso690.xsl:3 > biblio.xsl:3 > component.xsl:1 > division.xsl:1 > synop.xsl:1 > xref.xsl:1 > > simlarly, <b>: > autotoc.xsl:2 > block.xsl:10 > ebnf.xsl:1 > formal.xsl:1 > lists.xsl:1 > qandaset.xsl:3 > refentry.xsl:1 > titlepage.xsl:2 > > > Looking at every single instance above, I don't see a single one that > should remain a <b> or <i> instead of being either removed or changed > to <strong> or <em>. Does anyone want to argue why <b> and <i> should > be preserved for 1.76.1? > > > > > Thanks, > Keith > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]