[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook IEEE transformation?
Hi David, I don't know what is your notion of "easily IEEE-compliant", but while XSL-FO is certainly capable of producing such layouts I do expect you will need a substantial customization effort of the DB stock XSL-FO templates. The customization will definitely not be a one evening pastime. Regards, __peppo On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:06 PM, David Priest <docs@davidpriest.ca> wrote: > Sorry. I mean that IEEE has a particular visual appearance. It doesn't > look unusual, and I believe the stock XSL:FO are up to the task. > > I'm just very surprised to not see someone publishing a drop-in settings > file that cranks out IEEE layout. Figured I should check if there's a > reason. Hate to go barking down the wrong path. > > Dave Pawson wrote: >> >> On Mon, 09 May 2011 10:27:07 -0700 >> David Priest<docs@davidpriest.ca> wrote: >> >>> A bit of googling turns up a dearth of information about rendering >>> IEEE-compliant technical publications. This quite surprises me. >>> >>> Are the XSL:FO standard transformations easily IEEE-compliant? >> >> For what definition of IEEE compliant David? That sounds really odd >> to me, that a transform should be compliant to ... something? >> >> >>> Looking at one of their PDFs there does not seem to be anything >>> particularly special or tricksy with their layout. >> >> >> Or do you mean the PDF needs to be 'special' in some way? >> >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]