[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number...
<xsl:import href="../highlighting/common.xsl"/>The distribution does contain a highlighting/ini-hl.xml file, but it is referenced only in highlighting/xslthl-config.xml.
Is it possible someone has edited your stylesheet files? Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 2/17/2017 3:09 PM, stimits@comcast.net wrote:
Hi, This gets me a step further, but it looks like the docbook-xsl-ns-1.79.1 is missing part of what it needs. In "*fo/highlight.xsl*", line 21, there is this import: <xsl:import href="../highlighting/ini-hl.xsl"/> This file is missing and not part of the docbook 1.79.1 source code..."ini-hl.xsl" does not exist (the ".xml" version exists, but xsl is not there). The import is a relative path and so it looks like the file was intended to be part of the 1.79.1 files, but got excluded. Is there somewhere else I could download this? I have a separate download of xslthl-2.1.3, but this does not contain ini-hl.xsl (this too contains only ini-hl.xml). Incidentally, the same is true for other xsl files for each highlight language, e.g., bourne-hl.xml exists, but had build not aborted from the missing ini-hl.xsl, bourne-hl.xsl is also missing and would have been the next file in the list of languages to be missing. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> To: stimits@comcast.net, Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:26:03 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number... To clarify, the chapter in Norm Walsh's http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/ch05.html is about customizing the *schema* for DocBook, not the stylesheet. Information on customizing the stylesheet for DocBook 5 can be found here: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/CustomDb5Xsl.html Specifically for your case, you can create a simple customization layer by creating a file with this content: <?xml version="1.0"?> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format" xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" exclude-result-prefixes="d" version="1.0"> <xsl:import href="path-to/docbook-xsl-ns/fo/docbook.xsl"/> <xsl:import href="path-to/docbook-xsl-ns/fo/highlight.xsl"/> <xsl:param name="highlight.source" select="1"/> </xsl:stylesheet> And then referencing this file in your java command instead of ${XSLT}/fo/docbook.xsl. Since you are using DocBook 5, I assume you are using the namespaced version of the stylesheets, the one with "ns" in the directory name. If not, I suggest you do so as it will be more efficient. You can put other param settings and any other customizations in this file. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 2/15/2017 11:23 AM, stimits@comcast.net wrote:Hi, I do not currently customize other than param.xsl and fop.xconf, and have never created a customization layer. So I currently have no xsl:import of docbook.xsl other than where it would occur in the non-customized DocBook 5.1. Is this URL the correct information for the customization layer in the case of needing to import highlighting? I've not seen any xsl:import used in the context of this chapter so I may be completely wrong to look here: http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/ch05.html Currently I assemble one large monolithic XML file via xmllint and xinclude (individual files are chapters, appendices, so on, in a <book>). This is passed to jing for testing against docbook.rng. This is turned into an fo file via: /usr/bin/java \ -Dxslthl.config=file://${XSLTHL}/highlighters/xslthl-config.xml \ com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet \ -o ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo \ ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml \ ${XSLT}/fo/docbook.xsl \ use.extensions=1 The resulting fo file is turned into PDF format through fop (and hopefully later other formats). Would I be replacing fo/docbook.xsl in the above Java command with a custom xsl file which does nothing but import docbook.xsl and then fo/highlight.xsl? I ask because the chapter on customization seems to be more about writing individual lines of RNG code for new definitions or editing definitions without ever showing any xsl:import...I'm thinking I'm looking at the wrong customization if I use chapter 5 of guide. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> To: stimits@comcast.net, Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:43:03 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number... Hi, No, it does not need to be specific to each language. The imports should look something like this in your customization layer, putting it after the import of the main docbook.xsl: <xsl:import href="some/path/to/docbook-xsl/fo/docbook.xsl"/> <xsl:import href="some/path/to/docbook-xsl/fo/highlight.xsl"/> Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 2/15/2017 6:08 AM, stimits@comcast.net wrote:Hi, I see by default in fo/highlighting.xsl (I'm using fo): <xsl:import href="../highlighting/common.xsl"/> My XSL knowledge is minimal, but if for example I'm using bourne as the language, do I need to import something specific to bourne? The README has a note about importing, but it isn't clear what the intended import file is. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> To: stimits@comcast.net, Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:08:07 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number... I followed the instructions in my book for syntax highlighting, and it did not work. I know it worked when I wrote it, because I tested everything before I included it. It turns out that my book documents the 1.73.1 version of the stylesheets, and the highlighting was changed in version 1.74.3. Now your customization layer needs to use xsl:import on the appropriate highlight.xsl file, such fo/highlight.xsl. When I added that, syntax highlighting worked for me. The highlighting/README file in the distribution provided that crucial bit of information. I'm currently updating my book and will include this change. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 2/11/2017 12:42 PM, stimits@comcast.net wrote:Hi, From the link on Saxon plus other information I put together the simplest test case (which sort of works). The command is essentially this (other commands validate the XML with jing and xmllint before calling Saxon): CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH};\ java \ -Dxslthl.config=${XSLTHL}/highlighters/xslthl-config.xml \ com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet \ -o ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo \ ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml \ ${XSLT}/fo/docbook.xsl \ use.extensions=1 This does enable line numbering in programlisting tags, and options related to numbering do as expected. However, in attempting to get the syntax highlighting to work (see http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SyntaxHighlighting.html) nothing I've tried has any effect (test cases were with "bourne" and "ini" files). The CLASSPATH contains the following files, and no error occurs (for the sake of brevity I'm showing only the relative paths, but the full path is used without error in the actual Makefile):docbook-xsl-ns-1.79.1/tools/lib/*saxon.jar*:docbook5/stylesheet/docbook-xsl-ns-1.79.1/extensions/*saxon65.jar*:xml/xslthl-2.1.3/*xslthl-2.1.3.jar*Since I get no errors, and because the Saxon processing is otherwise working, is there any additional requirement to keep syntax highlighting from failing as if the option did not exist? Is syntax highlighting something which maybe requires the Xalan parser? Is there perhaps something from param.xsl which needs to change and not mentioned in the above URL on syntax highlighting? Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Hamilton <hamilton@xmlpress.net> To: stimits@comcast.net Cc: Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 00:50:21 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number... Hi, Here is the link to the part of Bob’s book that covers the Saxonprocessor:http://sagehill.net/docbookxsl/InstallingAProcessor.html#InstallSaxon I think you can keep the xmllint processing as is (I use it for XInclude processing, too), and just swap in saxon for xsltproc, using Bob’s instructions. I don’t bother swapping in Xerces (I don’t use any of the features that go beyond what Saxon supports). Best regards, Dick ------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net hamilton@xmlpress.netOn Feb 10, 2017, at 12:26, stimits@comcast.net wrote: Hi, I was going by this reference as to requirements, and have not readthe whole book (thus I did not yet see the Java requirement):http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/programlisting.html Admittedly I'm trying to do something quicker than I should and notreading everything (I've been through a lot of material, but it's just a drop in the bucket for everything needed when I really just need to sit down and write content). I've had some frustrations getting the Java-based processors working and have tried to stick to the xmllint/jing/xsltproc family for that single reason. The Java-based processing answer likely also answers my earlier syntax highlighting question about whether to abandon my current approach with xmllint.To use Saxon or Xalan I would have to change the current build scheme,which I've never succeeded at:xmllint --output "${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml" --nonet --noent-xinclude "${CONTENT}/${TITLE}.xml"xsltproc --output ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo ${XSLT}/docbook.xsl${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xmlfop -c ${PREFIX}/fop.xconf -fo ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo -pdf${OUT}/${TITLE}.pdfI realize I'm probably asking a lot, but is there any advice I can geton editing that chain of commands to instead work with Saxon or Xalan? Getting past the tools on the command line (for a hand written Makefile) is just getting frustrating and is why the current chain of commands have never evolved to anything Java-based.I do plan on reading more (I'm not resisting reading), but there areother requirements which tend to require at least a draft to be available sooner rather than later.Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> To: stimits@comcast.net, Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:09:00 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered">does not number...Hi, Did you read this section in my online book about line numbering? It only works with Java-based processors. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 2/10/2017 11:01 AM, stimits@comcast.net wrote: > Hi, > > Under DocBook 5.1 I've been able to list programs, but line numbering > has no effect (and there is no error under xmllint or jing). Is there > some ENTITY or other precondition required for line numbering under5.1?> > Thanks!--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]