[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element?
"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: > I've reviewed all the minutes and the mail archive, and it appears > that relatedlink was never approved. It came up in 2010 during the > development of the topic and assembly elements. The TC minutes discuss > adding it as an inline element, and there was a discussion of > reltables which we developed samples for but found too complicated and > postponed until after 5.1 Then we got into discussing the > relationships element in assembly, and there was no more mention of > relatedlink. Did we decide to not pursue relatedlink, or did we simply > forget about it? I'm afraid I don't recall. Larry, in your mind, does relatedlink fulfill a role that we're missing? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything has been said before, http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | but since nobody every listens we Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | have to keep going back and | beginning all over again.--André | Gide
Attachment:
pgpLlOHh0Pl5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]