[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: [docbook4] dbpoolx.mod incorrectness / same FPI for soextblx.dtd for all DB4 releases
I think he is suggesting that the content models are wrong, not the doc. The acronym element appears in the word.char.mix PE, but word.char.mix is used only in these content models: abbrev acronym label manvolnum wordasword I'm not sure these are particularly suitable to contain acronym. But acronym does not appear in the docinfo.char.mix PE, which is used in a lot more places, such as ackno, orgname, and many others. As it stands, you cannot put an acronym in an ackno or an orgname, which doesn't seem right. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com> To: <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:43 AM Subject: [docbook] Re: [docbook4] dbpoolx.mod incorrectness / same FPI for soextblx.dtd for all DB4 releases / Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net> was heard to say: | Could someone please comment on | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209147 (here on the | list is enough)? I'm currently updating this package and I'm wondering, | if the documentation is wrong or if docinfo.char.mix and word.char.mix | contain the wrong elements. My guess is that the PE definitions have drifted over time and the documentation has become out of date. If I had to guess, I'd say that we were persuaded to put acronym in some content model that included docinfo.char.mix but not word.char.mix and we couldn't put it in both because that would have resulted in an illegal content model.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]