[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook5: literallayout in entry gives validation errors
Hi, On Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2007, Jirka Kosek wrote: > Thomas Schraitle wrote: > > Ok, thanks. However, from a user perspective that's a bit > > unsatisfying as any XML editor happily inserts these block elements. > > :) > > I would not say any. Ok, I exaggerated a bit. :) > XXE doesn't allow this and although > autocompletition in oXygen offers this combination of elements they are > at the same time marked as invalid by red underlining. I know this option but I've disabled it. > You can submit this bug to oXygen developers. Good idea, I will send a bug report. > > So this gives you > > actually a false sense of validity although the DocBook Schema allows > > it. Unfortunatly, the error message from jing is not very helpful > > either. > > > > Probably this restriction can't be easily enforced in RELAX NG, > > right? Can it be checked with Schematron? > > This restriction is enforced by the current RELAX NG schema, this is > also reason why you get error message during validation. After I looked into the RNG schema again, I now understand why I was confused by this message. Thanks for your valuable explanations, Tom -- Thomas Schraitle
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]