[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: literal element db v5
On 05/09/09 12:59, Norman Walsh wrote: > Dave Pawson<davep@dpawson.co.uk> writes: > >>> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common >>> attribute. >> So it is a tdg omission then? > > Well. At the very least, it's not very clear :-) > > http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#ch05-classrole > > Be seeing you, > norm > OK. Mmm. My problem I guess. I'd always noted odd 'omissions' in tdg, but assumed the content accurate. Noting it wasn't showing at http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/literal.html I presumed it not valid. Is it one of those 'common' 'common' groupings? Perhaps visible off http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes Request that it be shown, if 'doable' please? TIA regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]