docbook message

Subject: Re: [docbook] Tabs and <formalgroup> content model

From: Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de>
To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:20:04 +0100

On 05.02.24 15:55, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:

[...]

And I donât think <group> would be an improvement either because itâs too
broad.


... and <group> is already taken:

  * group (db.group) â A group of elements in a cmdsynopsis
  * group (db.group.methodparam) â A group of method parametersV5.1
  * group (db.group.paramdef) â A group of parametersV5.1

:-)

--
GruÃ/Regards
  Thomas Schraitle

References:
- Tabs and <formalgroup> content model
  - From: Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de>
- Re: [docbook] Tabs and <formalgroup> content model
  - From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Re: [docbook] Tabs and <formalgroup> content model
  - From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>