[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dss-comment] Defining URIs ?
Hi folks, I would suppose to answer that special ResultMinors are no problem as long as the success / error conditions are not already covered by the core. The schema does not reject any new ResultMinor URIs. Any objections? Regarding the sample requests I would like to point him to Juan Carlos set of files. Greetings, Andreas > Dear all, > > > > I’m currently working with Oasis DSS and I have a few questions. > > I’m using an already existing signing server and we want it to be compliant > with Oasis DSS. The problem is that the set of errors returned by this > server is very specific and does not match with those defined by the Core > or the profiles. > > > > So, I’d like to know what are exactly the possibilities for me to work with > DSS because the URIs defined aren’t detailed enough. I know we can’t define > URIs for ResultMajor because URIs MUST be values defined by this > specification or by some profile of this specification, but what about > ResultMinor or DetailType ? > > Should we define our own URIs to be used with ResultMinor ? If yes, what > are the restrictions to do so ? What are you recommending ? > > > > Furthermore, is there any set of request/response that could be used as > examples/tests ? > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Regards, > > Sebastien > -- Andreas Kühne phone: +49 177 293 24 97 mailto: kuehne@trustable.de Trustable Ltd. Niederlassung Deutschland Gartenheimstr. 39C - 30659 Hannover Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 212612 Director Andreas Kühne Company UK Company No: 5218868 Registered in England and Wales
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]