[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] some changes in requirements draft 3
At 06:08 PM 4/8/2003 +0100, Nick Pope wrote: >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Can I suggest that we use the same structure as SAML for including the name >with a type identifier (but without the rest of the SAML structure) or the >full SAML structure. > >Again can we have the ability to identify the authentication algorithm >without the full SAML structure (and its associated semantics). Do you mean we should support those instead of, or in addition to, using a full SAML Assertion? What's the rationale for not wanting to use the full Assertion? Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]