[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] anonymous types
> >schema in another schema. We might use the same type definition in a number > >of places in our own schema. Then we will be forced to use the same name. Let's not assume that this is a problem. We're forcing *some* name-sharing, either by introducing a type name, or by making the element name shared. Let's be careful before we double the number of names (element and type), or break inconsistency (to re-use this, ues the element, but to re-use that, use the type). For example, container elements avoid the problem, at the cost of one extra level of nesting. It is often more clear to say <dss:SigningKey><ds:KeyInfo>... then to say <dss:SigningKey>... and have to read the schema to know that it's a dsig:KeyInfo element. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]