[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] BPSS evolution
Charles Ames wrote: >Hello All, > >I am new to the TC, so please forgive my ignorance of protocol. Is there a >primer of some sort that I could read in order to get up to speed our >agenda, goals, and procedures? I look forward to working with you all and >being a productive contributor. > > mm1: Thanks, Charles. We hope to have all our team as productive contributors. I think this brings up whether we need a short summary (1-2 pages) that introduces BPSS to our team (for newcomers and as a refresher as well). I will bring this up today in the call at 1 p.m. PST (Monday, Tuesday in Asia). Thanks. >Best, > >-Chuck > >--- >Charles Ames >CEO, Oak Grove Systems >http://oakgrovesystems.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jean-Jacques Dubray [mailto:jeanjadu@Attachmate.com] >Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:26 PM >To: ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: [ebxml-bp] BPSS evolution > > >hi: > >here is a list of possible directions to evolve ebXML BPSS: > >1. Control flow: 1.01 / 1.1 BPSS control is based on modified UML activity >diagram semantics. This is a bit limiting and UML is changing these >semantics in UML 2.0 > a. we could liaise with ws-chor and see if we could reference a ws-chor >definition for a business transaction, binary and multiparty collaboration >definitions. > b. we could look at the work of Will Van Der Aalst if liaison with >ws-chor is not possible >2. Business Transactions: 1.01 / 1.1 BPSS BT Message Exchange Pattern is not >general enough > We could extend the definition of BT (or other concepts) via different >MEPs >3. Business Transaction Protocol: 1.01/1.1 Embedded in the BPSS spec > a. we could liaise with ws-caf or other relevant BTP groups and specify >their usage in the context of BPSS rather than >4. Specify a WSDL binding for the BSI: 1.01/1.1 currently no work has been >done in this direction. >5. Allow for a mixed mode: business transaction / web service within a >collaboration definition. >6. Orchestration / Choreography / Collaboration architecture and bindings > Today there is still a lot of confusion on these concepts. We need to >provide a better picture on how these concepts play together in a common >architecture. > >7. I have a few more but I would like for other to propose them > >It would be good also if we could surface the issue of web services >alignement to all ebXML working groups. > >Best regards, >Jean-Jacques Dubray >attachmate >3617 131st Ave >Bellevue, WA 98006 >tel: 425-649-6584 >Cell: 508-333-7634 > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]