[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: isLegallyBinding ;was Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] eBusiness MetamodelEARLY DRAFT 0.03
Duane Nickull wrote: > The two also intersect and reveal areas that need further thinking. > For instance, the attribute "isLegalyBinding" is, IMO, irresponsible > to place into a BP artifact since laws differ from country to > country. It would be impossible to require this declaration until all > contexts are known. The BP must reflect this by making this attribute > [0..1] IMO. You are not alone here. The latest ideas in BP team revolves around removing isLegallyBinding and propose that a Flag is added to StandardBusinessDocument Header that signifies TEST or PRODUCTION or similar. Which is by the way is supported by EAN.UCC, see attachment. /anders -- ///////////////////////////////////// / Business Collaboration Toolsmiths / / website: <www.toolsmiths.se> / / email: <anderst@toolsmiths.se> / / phone: +46 8 562 262 30 / / mobile: +46 70 546 66 03 / /////////////////////////////////////
UNCEFACT Standard Business Document Header.pdf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]