[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] Clarification - FORK and BusinessTransaction
-----Original Message----- From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 3:42 PM To: Yunker, John Cc: Dale Moberg; David RR Webber; BPSS ebXML Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] Clarification - FORK and BusinessTransaction Yunker, John wrote: >I will be on the call for the first 1/2 hour. > >Re: "is all complete or just fails" --> complete may either be >"business success" or "business failure" and still have "technical >success". Transaction business success / failure may be (are usually) >guards on the transitions within the business process. Technical >failure usually requires some sort of technical intervention. > >My concern is that transactions are the building blocks for process, >and as such once we allow elements of transactions to be the building >blocks we destroy the integrity of the transaction. A transaction >should be very well defined in pre-conditions and post-conditions, >allowing binding to policy etc, in essence being atomic with respect to >the process model. > >Talk to you on Monday. > > +1 unless there is further indications that the business aspects of business transaction should be changed (likely not by this team). +1 also to this group not getting involved in changing "business aspects of business transaction"!!!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]