[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposed repair RE: [ebxml-bp] Errata on example 3.4.11.2 discussion.
I have had some discussion off list
concerning adding a BTA to 3.4.11.2 so that the idrefs in the Decision elements
make sense. There is a Credit Check CommercialActivity that we can “reference”
that makes sense of the example. Note that a Role is added for the Credit
Authority also. I will check this against the schema, but business analysts
(who have absorbed enough BPSS syntax to read examples) can check this now. The
ID values mentioned in the new BTA occur in previous examples. <BusinessCollaboration
name="Firm Order" nameID="ID122A38D93">
<Role name="buyer" nameID="ID122A38DA3"/>
<Role name="seller" nameID="ID122A38DA5"/>
<Role name="creditauthority" nameID="ID122A38DA7"/>
<TimeToPerform duration="P1D"/>
<Start name="ID876F38OP5" nameID="ID876F38OP5">
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="ID122A39C23"/>
</Start>
<BusinessTransactionActivity name="Place Order"
nameID="ID122A39C23"
businessTransactionRef="ID122A3DD33"
hasLegalIntent="true">
<TimeToPerform duration="PT4H"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA3"
performsRoleRef="ID122A3E833"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA5"
performsRoleRef="ID122A3E863"/>
</BusinessTransactionActivity> <BusinessTransactionActivity
name="Check Credit" nameID="ID122A39C24"
businessTransactionRef=" ID122A3DD33"
hasLegalIntent="true">
<TimeToPerform duration="PT4H"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA5" performsRoleRef="CCinitiator1"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA7" performsRoleRef="CCresponder1"/>
</BusinessTransactionActivity>
<Success name="Success" nameID="D2JSK99AK"/>
<Failure name="Failure" nameID="DK9726AJ"/>
<Decision>
<FromLink fromBusinessStateRef="ID122A39C23"/>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="ID122A39D24">
<ConditionExpression
expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Success"/>
</ToLink>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="DK9726AJ">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Failure"/>
</ToLink>
</Decision>
<Decision>
<FromLink fromBusinessStateRef="ID122A39D24"/>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="D2JSK99AK">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Success"/>
</ToLink>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="DK9726AJ">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Failure"/>
</ToLink>
</Decision> </BusinessCollaboration> From: Dale Moberg
[mailto:dmoberg@us.axway.com] After removing the redundant Transition element, there is
still a problem with example 3.4.11.2 Monica and I tried to guess what happened. We _think_ that an ellipsis for a missing BTA
got dropped out when moving from the example to the xml validity checking tool
and back again. What this means is that the two Decision elements become
very confusing because there is a missing BTA with ID value =
ID122A39D24. Options: 1. Restore ellipsis 2. Add a BTA (what BTA would we go to after a successful
PlaceOrder in order to form a BC called “Firm Order”???) 3. Edit out the decision referencing the missing BTA. Against 1, the ellipsis is confusing and makes for a confusing example Against 3, the text seems to be thinking of there being two BTAs and a
(lower case) transition between them (accomplished by a Decision) Against 2, I am not certain what BTA is needed to make a Firm Order
from a PlaceOrder. Credit check of some kind? Any proposals? <BusinessCollaboration
name="Firm Order" nameID="ID122A38D93">
<Role name="buyer" nameID="ID122A38DA3"/>
<Role name="seller" nameID="ID122A38DA5"/>
<TimeToPerform duration="P1D"/>
<Start name="ID876F38OP5" nameID="ID876F38OP5">
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="ID122A39C23"/>
</Start>
<BusinessTransactionActivity name="Place Order" nameID="ID122A39C23"
businessTransactionRef="ID122A3DD33"
hasLegalIntent="true">
<TimeToPerform duration="PT4H"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA3"
performsRoleRef="ID122A3E833"/>
<Performs currentRoleRef="ID122A38DA5" performsRoleRef="ID122A3E863"/>
</BusinessTransactionActivity>
<Success name="Success" nameID="D2JSK99AK"/>
<Failure name="Failure" nameID="DK9726AJ"/>
<Decision>
<FromLink fromBusinessStateRef="ID122A39C23"/>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="ID122A39D24">
<ConditionExpression
expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Success"/>
</ToLink>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="DK9726AJ">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Failure"/>
</ToLink>
</Decision>
<Decision>
<FromLink fromBusinessStateRef="ID122A39D24"/>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="D2JSK99AK">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Success"/>
</ToLink>
<ToLink toBusinessStateRef="DK9726AJ">
<ConditionExpression expressionLanguage="ConditionGuardValue"
expression="Failure"/>
</ToLink>
</Decision> </BusinessCollaboration> |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]