[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] TimeToPerform tag in ebxmlbp-2.0.4-Example-os-PIP7C7For2.04-en.xml
[informational example. needs resolution
of how and where corrections to informational artifacts are to be made] TimeToPerform tag in
ebxmlbp-2.0.4-Example-os-PIP7C7For2.04-en.xml 1. For
expressing that a TimeToPerform should be specified when using a ebBP spec. for
two particular partners? 2. For
expressing that a TimeToPerform should be computed at runtime? The example PIP7C7For2.04 was produced by
running a 1.1 RosettaNet PIP BP example through an XSLT script to convert
versions. The example from RosettaNet was missing time to perform information,
and the script generated an empty element. So perhaps we need a script fix to handle this situation so the output
is misleading. On the other hand, it is a good idea to have time to perform
information in a robust ebBP specification. But your observation that the empty value is not useful is definitely
correct! |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]