[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] call Monday 11am PT
Jacques,
Attached are my comments for today's
conf call. In short, here are the highlights:
Test Requirement #2 - How to write
an abstract test to represent testing all global syntax and
semantics,
as specified in ebMS. I don't think that one
abstract test can do that, but that the combination of ALL abstract
tests can reasonably conclude conformance to syntax
and semantics of ebMS specification
Test Requirement #56
-
I do not believe that we disagree about what the specification is saying…
I believe it is saying (rather poorly, and Pete and I agreed)
if there are no errors, there is no errorlist…
NOT
there are no “empty” ErrorLists present in a message….
Comments?
I've
also added some typo/grammar changes to the Abstract Test Suite section
that you wrote.
Cheers,
Mike
|
IIC_MS_Conformance_TestSuite_V0.92_subset_JD_MK.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]