[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-jc] 1/12/2005: ebxml-jc Meeting Minutes 12 January 2005
Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > Why does SOA seem controversial? mm1: The comment made was that SOA may be perceived as 'owned' by several large companies (whose efforts are outside OASIS) who may have considerable weight within OASIS. > Why would large companies want to push back? > -Matt > >> ......5. Other business >> a. ebSOA status and ebXML JC >> Martin: What is status? >> Breininger: There is still an ebSOA. Form new TC for higher level SOA >> reference model. There would be separate liaising TCs. Someone will >> take over as chair for ebSOA; there seems to be critical TC mass as >> well. Will participate in both SOA and ebSOA. Suggest collaboration >> between ebSOA, SOA and ebxml-jc. >> Moberg: SOA will not document ebXML architecture. It is relevant but >> will not have an influence presumably. Some participants in ebSOA >> didn't want to be constrained to ebXML. >> Durand: We are concerned about the direction being taken with SOA. We >> will participate in ebSOA. >> Moberg: I am surprised other large companies are not pushing back on >> an SOA TC...... >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]