Re: [ebxml-msg] envelope.xsd

[Doug Bunting <dougb62@yahoo.com>]

Arvola,

This looks fine to me except for the process by which the schema directory changed.  Shouldn't the group have voted upon this proposal before that occurred?  This materially changes what we're submitting to the OASIS membership.  I would certainly have voted in favour but worry we're not following the process ("for all changes to the spec, even editorial", to paraphrase) we agreed upon.

thanx,
    doug

Arvola Chan wrote:

> Doug:David,
> Cliff, and I had a conference call yesterday. The version for envelope.xsd
> on the TC web site we arrived at has the following contents:
...
> On
> the web page, we now have two files with identical contents: msg-header-2_0.xsd
> and msg-header-2_0c.xsd. Each contains the following declaration:
> > > ...