[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov] ebXML Registry SCM (& Semantic Interoperability)
Wrightson wrote:
Good point Anne. It would be very helpful if we could discuss some specific use cases to illustrate what semantic interoperability may entail. I am attach I agree. That would be an undesirable constraint. I had suggested in my email that Semantic Content Management (SCM) SC will not be enough: > The SCM SC would address only the core foundation of vocabulary semantic and syntax based upon OWL/RDF etc. > We would still need things like Naming and Design Rules to be addressed elsewhere. I assumed that SCM SC would provide a core infrastructure that enables semantic interop by allowing content to be described using ontology based meta data. I was assuming that there would be other SCs within egov TC and possibly other existing TCs where the rest of semantic interop was addressed. For example Naming and Design Rules could be an SC in egov TC. Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. Another key position I stated in my message was that I was not sure that a new Semantic interoperability OASIS TC would necessarily be a good idea. That was based on concern that it could lead to too many overlapping standards activities all competing for contributors and charter. What we need is to make the existing TCs work together better (IMHO). Of course above opinion is in a vacuum and is based on my gut feel. It would help to identify the scope of proposed Semantic Interoperability TC ilustrated with some with use cases to reach an informed opinion. -- Regards, Farrukh |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]