[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov] Proposed Use Case template
Rex Brooks wrote: > However, the question at issue isn't the cost of the toolset or even a > choice between one or another modeling language per se, although I > personally prefer UML. The question is one of grounding the derivation > of the use-cases. The simplified model of ontological participants > Farrukh suggests is very high level and assumes a Domain Expert, > Content Publisher and a Registry Group and that's fine at a high > level. I'm suggesting developing lower level scenarios more > appropriate to the domains for which Farrukh's model assumes a Domain > Expert. > Oops! Now I understand the source the confusion surrounding this thread. Please note that the actual content of the use case I submitted is irrelvant. Only the structure is relevant to be considered by this TC for the actual use cases we may discuss. To recap, I had observed that we agreed that use case were a good way to focus our discusions concerning egov requirements. I therefore suggested template for submitting new use cases. The structure of the template is relevant, the actual content (actors etc.) is not. I have not submitted any use cases for the egov TC yet (only a suggested template for doing so). Hopefully this will clarify the miscommunication on my part. Thanks. -- Regards, Farrukh -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [egov] Proposed Use Case template Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:18:40 -0500 From: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> To: OASIS eGov list <egov@lists.oasis-open.org> Folks, We seem to agree on the value of use case identification as a tool to nail down requirements. It would help if we all use a consistent use case template. To facilitate use case discussions, attached below is a sample use case that I propose as a template for other use case discussion. Feel free to suggest improvements or ask questions. We could start by applying this template to use cases for Semantic Interoperability. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]