huml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [huml] A BAA and Application of HumanML
- From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 06:15:09 -0700
Title: Re: [huml] A BAA and Application of
HumanML
I looked at this briefly, and concurred with the consensus of
James and Rob that the deadline makes this less desireable as a
target. Also, my overview indicates that this is more a knowledge
management issue that would then feed data to a heuristic
program--which would only be part of a functional solution to the
problem space Len conceived.
"...
Functionally, the
LifeLog (sub)system consists of three components: data capture and
storage, representation and abstraction, and data access and user
interface. LifeLog accepts as input a number of raw physical and
transactional data streams. Through inference and
reasoning..."
Through inference and reasoning? I don't think so.. I would
rephrase this: "Through parameter comparison, model similarities,
outcome comparisons and control group comparisons, probabilistic
conclusions can be drawn and decision tree branches can be constructed
with data inputs to offer decision point options with probabilities
for projected outcomes provided."
Asking for 'x is to y as u is to v, or as r will be to s, if or
when...' conditional inference reasoning assumes explicit control over
physical data and conceptual definition which, even with good fuzzy
logic, (to which I personally do not subscribe) will fall prey to
linguistic variability at the least, and inconsistent data due to
aspect alone.
I'm not saying it can't be done, just that I don't think we could
do it in slightly less than 3 weeks.
Ciao,
Rex
At 9:57 AM -0500 6/3/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/Solicitations/PIP_03-30.html
Add this to the sets of things that can be done with HumanML.
That is a BAA.
Whether one should or not is a different issue. Note that
they
make reference to the "realistic lives of game characters"
and
so on, so this dovetails HumanML perfectly.
Of course, once you have data of this kind and sufficient analysis
computing power, it isn't hard to take the next step of behavioral
modification through injecting events, sometimes called, 'early
interdiction'.
If one wants to test this in a semi-closed system that is just
open enough to provide varying contexts, but small enough to
control the contexts as well as overcome instrumentation limits
without violating constitutional freedoms, prison populations
should work.
len
You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/huml/members/leave_workgroup.php
--
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]