[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: DocumentStampInformation
The federal courts put their Hash out there as part of the Document Stamp (which is a verification btw). We need to also deal with Block Chain for this IMHO. Brazil does a nice job on this. I wrote about it back in March at:
https://courttechbulletin.blogspot.com/2018/03/court-document-verification-in-brazil.html Notice that they include a “verification code” and a CRC code. Jim M From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of James E Cabral Enrique, stampinformation:DocumentStampInformationMessage includes ecf:CaseTrackingID and j:CaseNumberText which I believe is correct. stampinformationcallback:NotifyDocumentStampInformationMessage includes ecf:CaseTrackingID and nc:Case.
Is there a reason stampinformation:DocumentStampInformationMessage should include nc:Case? __ From:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Othon, Enrique <Enrique.Othon@tylertech.com> I was looking at the DocumentStampInformation request and I noticed the schema doesn’t include an nc:Case element. Is there a reason for that or just an oversight? |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]