[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Which ODF are we talking about?
Burg, HJM (Harm Jan) van (INNOVATIE) wrote: > There is a current ODF. A standard greatly dominated by Sun to bash > Microsoft. Uhmm... the open document format is neither dominated by Sun (check the OpenDocument TC's membership) nor is it to bash Microsoft. > In my mind this forces us to start working with big industry > players (including other OASIS members) to achieve a truly open document > format. In which way does OpenDocument fail to be truly open? It is a public standard without any restriction on use. It is maintained by an independent standards body. It was designed by several different players, some who are competitors (e.g. Sun, Corel, KDE) and some who are customers (e.g. Boeing, National Archives of Australia, Biblical Society). I can't imagine any way that OpenDocument could be more open. > To be exact: in my mind any format not supported by the big > players does not need an adoption TC because it will never be widely > adopted. IBM and Sun are big players. Several large customers and governments are adopting it. > My government or my > tax administration is currently not supporting or using the present ODF > nor does it have the intention to do so in the near future. Perhaps we can discuss the benefits of an open data format for a government. > Ps if this TC feels that ODF adoption has to mean: only promoting this > ODF than -of course- I will not hinder the process of this TC and leave. ODF is the short hand for the OASIS OpenDocument Format for Office Applications. I hope you'll be interested in discussing the pros and cons of this format both here and at your local government. Best, Daniel. -- /\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org /\/_/ /\/_/ A life? Sounds great! \/_/ Do you know where I could download one? /
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]