[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Recap of ODF Camp for OASIS News
Hi On 2007-10-02, at 09:52 , Carol Geyer wrote: > Peter, > This is a big help, thanks. > > Would you or someone else from the TC post this ODF Camp recap on > OpenDocument > XML.org? > > Should we create a Forum on opendocument.xml.org to discuss the > interoperability issues that were identified at ODF Camp? We have a > Forum for > "Positioning, Benefits, Compatibility, and Interoperability" > http://opendocument.xml.org/positioning-forum -- but that seems a > bit broad. > > --c > > -----Original Message----- > From: peter.vandenabeele.be@gmail.com > [mailto:peter.vandenabeele.be@gmail.com] > On Behalf Of Peter Vandenabeele > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:27 AM > To: Carol Geyer > Cc: odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Recap of ODF Camp for OASIS News > > On 10/1/07, Carol Geyer <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org> wrote: >> Can someone send me 2-3 sentences on the ODF Camp that I can use in > tomorrow's >> OASIS News? > > I did not see any other contribution ? (Maybe in private) > > A possible text could be: > > ODF Camp was held parallel to the OpenOffice.org 2007 conference in > Barcelona on 20 September 2007 with about 30 participants. > Interoperability > of ODF documents Was it the documents that were being tested for interoperability or the applications? eg, Interoperability among ODF applications... > was tested with documents generated in > StarOffice/OpenOffice.org, IBM Symphony, Google Docs, KOffice, > MS Office 2003 + Sun plug-in, MS Office 2003 + odf-converter and > SEPT-solutions Mobile Office. Different levels of > interoperability problems > where discovered (user errors (e.g. using spaces), technical > problems > (application bugs), interop problems with applications that have > a different > native format (e.g. frames-in-frames in MS Office), conceptual > problems of > document representation (e.g. how to represent bi-language > documents)). > The discussion will be followed-up online by the participants. > > I hope I did not forget any contribution ? Any other feedback on this > proposed text ? Thanks louis > > Thanks, > > Peter Vandenabeele >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]