[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Minutes: ODF Adoption TC Call 05 May 2009
Can anyone give me a number he/she has dialed? Thanks Charles. Le Tue, 19 May 2009 22:35:24 +0800, Peter Junge <peterjunge@RedOffice.com> a écrit : > Hi Charles, > > in fact we're having it. > > Best regards, > Peter > > Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Aren't we supposed to have our call now? > > > > Best, > > Charles. > > > > > > Le Tue, 19 May 2009 10:01:22 -0400, > > Louis Suarez-Potts <Louis.Suarez-Potts@Sun.COM> a écrit : > > > >> Dear TC Members: > >> > >> Please find the draft minutes of our 5 May 2009 TC meeting below. > >> > >> Proposed Agenda > >> =============== > >> > >> 1.) Logistics > >> - Roll call > >> > >> Name > >> Company > >> Status > >> Peter Junge > >> Beijing Redflag Chinese 2000 Software Co.,... > >> Group Member > >> Bart Hanssens > >> Fedict > >> Group Member > >> Donald Harbison > >> IBM > >> Group Member > >> Robert Weir > >> IBM > >> Group Member > >> Alan Clark > >> Novell* > >> Group Member > >> Marino Marcich > >> OpenDocument Format Alliance (ODFA) > >> Group Member > >> Michael Brauer > >> Sun Microsystems > >> Group Member > >> > >> - Determination of quorum status > >> Meeting Statistics Quorum rule 51% of voting members Achieved > >> quorum true Counts toward voter eligibility true Individual > >> Attendance Members: 7 of 35 (20%) > >> Voting Members: 6 of 8 (75%) (used for quorum calculation) > >> Company Attendance Companies: 6 of 19 (31%) > >> Voting Companies: 5 of 6 (83%) > >> - Approval of minutes from April 7, 2009 TC meeting > >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/odf-adoption/email/archives/200904/msg00005.html > >> > >> > >> > >> The minutes were approved. > >> > >> - Acceptance of today's agenda > >> > >> 2.) Review, TC Action Item plan: > >> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/odf-adoption/OdfAdoptionTcActionItems - > >> All The TC discussed the event plan at length with a focus on the > >> Government 2.0 Summit (O'Reilly Conference), the upcoming > >> interoperability event at The Hague (June 15 - 16), and the > >> OpenOffice.org Conference in early November (Orvieto, Italy). > >> > >> The TC agreed to plan another ODF plug-fest, or 'camp' for the > >> OpenOffice.org Conference. Don to the action item to 'put the stake > >> in the ground' with the conference organizers via the new > >> discussion list at OpenOffice.org. Bart agreed to promote this at > >> the OIC TC list as well, once it has taken shape. > >> > >> The TC agreed to review and update the ODF Adoption wiki with a > >> current list of ODF implementations. Rob can reference this in his > >> State of ODF Interoperability Report being drafted for the ODF > >> Interoperability and Conformance TC. > >> > >> Bart informed the TC of an upcoming Microsoft Document > >> Interoperability Initiative event, scheduled for London on May > >> 18th. Bart will attend. > >> > >> Bart is creating a rough draft of a Digital Signature profile as > >> part of his efforts at the OIC TC. > >> > >> Bart is speaking in Zagreb where he'll be be presenting an ODF key > >> note at the DORS/CLUC 2009 event (www.open.hr). > >> > >> > >> > >> --- Marino adoption plan: that requests come from Carol G. and not > >> just from ODF Alliance. > >> > >> Update: two weeks time > >> > >> -- > >> Draft ODF is a web standards; w3c interest group 12 May but they > >> ignore issueof docs and do not consider formats as a web standard; > >> ignore standard and do not reference XML or doc formats. oppose > >> proprietary formats etc but nothing specific. the w3c report to be > >> issued will have no impact then on doc web standards. > >> - Marino: take a look at the working draft but it does not see it > >> as relevant. > >> - rob they have shown little interest in ODF > >> - there is no reference to odf or other doc formats, besides > >> anti-proprietary > >> - Rob: w3c do not do things absent ref implementation... ask what > >> do you want to do: odf in a browser? then get firefox to do it; > >> nothing will happen unless there is an implementation. > >> -marino: initial report in 12 May but they may extend the mandate, > >> as they are interested in expanding it and there is still time to > >> engage them in this. > >> - rob: could push the odf packaging model--file with manifest, > >> etc.: killer thing for web as well, to lay out browser specs. They > >> have not solved this problem in w3c. Post 1.2, the packaging model > >> will be split. > >> > >> look at this later. > >> > >> > >> 3.) ODF Interoperability Event at The Hague - Bart Hanssens > >> > >> 4.) Government 2.0 Summit - Don > >> > >> > >> > >> 5.) OpenOffice.org Conference - Louis > >> > >> no update but time to investigate and drive :-) > >> > >> Peter: they are contacting prior organizers (peter, jesus, et al.) > >> and interested to know what the odf adoption can do this year; and > >> want a larger odf event this year than prior. They want an > >> adoption event in Orvieto. > >> Louis: they must work publicly and on the lists. The TC can help > >> but we need for them to work with us more publicly. > >> Peter: looking for sponsors..... > >> > >> > >> > >> 6.) ODF News / Round Table -- All > >> > >> > >> > >> Peter Junge: RedOffice will bridge ODF and UOF. It currently > >> defaults to read/write ODF V1.1. > >> > >> --cannot say too much about it; there is an english versin of spec > >> but it is not too good... colleagues working oin it; nothing new > >> at the moment. > >> > >> -- RedOffice is shipping 4.5 is soon to be released.. .supporting > >> ODF 1.1 > >> > >> -- > >> Marino: nothing > >> Alan: nothing to add > >> Rob: quick update on ODF TC: approved 0.2 of draft 1.2 and put it > >> out for review; community drafts issued 3/4 weeks. Next week > >> meeting in Brussels in idabc on Nature of Administrative > >> Documents, and several of us have been invited to this--additional > >> requirements for ODF -press on this not until public review > >> - technical estimate of when review: Not before July for public > >> review. Marino that means that we have papers, press material by > >> end of June. Issue is that we want to get this done before vacation > >> season. Michael Bauer: when would this be done for public review? > >> Opinion? we separate public review from formula (formal?) part as > >> that latter needs more work; and July seems likely too for public > >> review. But it depends on how many public comments we receive. The > >> two large blocs are editorial notes in spec and public > >> comments--received in March 170 alone. Time depends then on the > >> number of comments received in the next few weeks. > >> > >> Marino but given info we can still draft white papers for end of > >> June. MB: from technical perspective, the spec is complete--so we > >> know the tech details, like new features, etc. Specis complete but > >> what is not is the editorial element--the annotation--not the > >> actual determination of the functionality. > >> MB: last draft is not quite available but will be shortly, as > >> requirement of Oasis is that there have to be various publishable > >> versions. Will be available sometime this week. > >> > >> --RT: michael bauer: nothing besides the above > >> -- louis: importance of w3c,gov't needing good arguments for > >> migrating to odf > >> > >> > >> > >> Marino: Drafting an ODF V1.2 brochure; will circulate this to the > >> TC. > >> > >> The meeting was adjourned. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC > >> that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in > >> OASIS at: > >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- Charles-H. Schulz Associé / Associate Ars Aperta.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]