[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Groups - ODF 1.2 Introduction and Overview (ODF1-2 Intro.odp) uploaded
Am 31.01.2011 23:01, schrieb donald_harbison@us.ibm.com: > Please review and comment. Slide 3: Iconic image on the left side doesn't fit. Slide 6: Double negation (??) Slide 7: Complicated and complex wording, double negation? "..is *not* - It is not a limitation... It is *not* being fully implemented by Microsoft, although Office 2007 with SP2 is a good start!" --> Office 2010 (?) --> = it's supported and the implementation is getting more complete (?) Slive 11: Delete ", for example", add item "* ..." Slide 13: "Interop" "Better interop, especially in a word [?] of promiscuous mashups, not monolithic silos" Trim down bulleted items, strongest argument first, delete e.g.: "Can leverage existing community expertise" Slide 17: Relevance? Slide 19: (8) implementation of ODF -> (8) ? Slide 21: delete "We have" Opportunity --> Solution? "Create an ODF API that exposes a higher level abstraction of ODF to application developers" --> redundant when listeners know the term API. "so they can quickly become productive with ODF processing without having to master a >700 page specification." --> delete, see left side. Slide 25 What do you want to say here? Best regards AR
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]