[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] EOMONTH Function Test Cases (Section 6.9.8)
Andreas J Guelzow wrote: > how could this be? According to the draft, the conversion of > "2006-01-05" into a date is implementation defined, so that date could > be May 1st! Where do you see that? If it says that, it's a mistake. The form YYYY-MM-DD is intended to be completely unambiguous; that format is _ALWAYS_ ISO format. Yes, we have the problem that MM/DD/YY and DD/MM/YY are both in use, but that's not the format in view here. ISO format was used for in the test cases specifically because it's NOT ambiguous. --- David A. Wheeler
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]